As criminals are convicted all over the country, the Nevada Supreme Court is currently debating whether or not to release OJ and friend from prison. The two were convicted of armed robbery and kidnapping, crimes that carry a mandatory prison sentence. Subsequently, the pair were denied release pending their appeals. It seems awfully unfair that these men would not be allowed to walk the streets after committing a crime of such magnitude. The injustice is even greater because the two were tried together. In light of this, CJ Stewart’s lawyer claims that the trial was prejudicial against his client. Why does he feel this way? Because Stewart had to sit alongside Simpson. Why oh why should Stewart, a mere thief and kidnapper have to sit next to a murderer? The preconceptions are abounding! After all, the conviction has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Stewart committed the crime WITH Simpson. Meanwhile, OJ’s lawyer Yale Galanter assures that his client will abide by the terms of his release. Simpson learned his lesson in time-out: Murder, armed robbery and kidnapping are bad! The trial was completely bogus and unfounded. Nobody deserves to be released more than Simpson and Stewart!